- Advocacy Alerts
- Environmental Justice
- Climate Adaptation & Resiliency
- Nutrients & Farm Bill
- Infrastructure Funding & Affordability
- Integrated Planning
- Toilets Are Not Trashcans
- Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds
- Affordable Water, Resilient Communities Campaign
- CWA-SDWA Intersection
- Water Resources Utility of the Future
- Water Quantity/Water Quality Nexus
- Congressional Toolbox
- Legislative Updates
- Regulatory Updates
- Litigation Tracking
As the nation’s leading advocacy voice for municipal stormwater utilities across the country, NACWA is dedicated to protecting water quality; addressing large-scale watershed impacts, such as flooding and erosion; and solving related modern-day challenges, such as water quality impairment from stormwater runoff and land-use impacts.
The Association and its members are committed to advancing robust, innovative programs and working collaboratively with regulators and stakeholders. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) MS4 General Permit Remand Rule, issued in early 2017, represents a change in the development and issuance of National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits for small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s). And it has coincided with apparent shifts toward more restrictive, water quality-based requirements in all stormwater permits - Phase I and Phase II - and away from the more flexible maximum extent practicable (MEP) standard found in the Clean Water Act (CWA).
NACWA supports rational, cost-effective stormwater policies and regulations that allow stormwater utilities to prioritize investments in a way that will achieve the best water quality results. Its advocacy efforts include ensuring the availability of adequate funding and financing models for municipalities, as well as being a leading advocate for defending and preserving the MEP standard to which all MS4s are held.
Recent developments suggest municipal stormwater permitting will continue to increase in complexity. For example:
- Bipartisan federal legislation has been introduced in Congress that would incorporate Integrated Planning and “green infrastructure” into the CWA.
- Nutrient trading initiatives to reduce phosphorus and nitrogen loadings are becoming a popular solution in the Chesapeake Bay and elsewhere.
- Increasing attention is being paid to pesticides and other emerging contaminants that are problematic in stormwater runoff.
- Attempts by EPA are emerging to impose post-construction water quality and quantity controls in MS4 permits.
NACWA members interested in up-to-date information on stormwater issues should join the Stormwater Management Committee for all the latest information and updates.
For more information, contact Emily Remmel, NACWA’s Director, Regulatory Affairs.
NACWA Stormwater Resources
In the wake of the final Phase II Remand Rule in 2016, there has been a significant regulatory evolution within EPA’s NPDES permitting program for small MS4s. Given the regulatory uncertainty in the realm of MS4 permitting, and NACWA’s commitment to advancing robust stormwater programs, the Association has developed a Stormwater Permit Screening Program that will help MS4 permittees navigate the growing complexities often found in renewed stormwater permits. The Program is designed to assist utilities – particularly MS4 Phase II permittees – better understand permit language and options available to permittees during the permit issuance process.
The Stormwater Permit Screening Program works by offering permittees a high-level review of a draft permit and providing individualized feedback using a checklist of priority issues. This analysis is intended to help guide permittees through consideration of many factors and flag potentially impractical requirements. While the Screening Program does not provide legal advice, it may help inform permittees of possible permit language concerns and associated regulatory obligations.
The Screening Program reviews draft permits for several themes central to the Clean Water Act and MS4 permits, including maximum extent practicable (MEP) requirements, water quality standards, total maximum daily loads, impaired waters, and water quality trading.
Usually, MS4 draft permits have a short turn-around for public comment (e.g., 30 days). If MS4s would like to participate and have NACWA review draft permit language, please let us know as soon as possible when draft language is available so that we can review and provide feedback.
The Stormwater Permit Screening Tool builds off NACWA’s 2018 MS4 Stormwater Permitting Guide that will aid all municipal stormwater managers—particularly in small and medium-sized communities—as they navigate the stormwater permitting process. The MS4 Permitting Guide is also intended to assist expert stormwater professionals seeking to answer more advanced related stormwater questions. Download the MS4 Stormwater Permitting Guide today!
NACWA also published a document in 2016, entitled Navigating Litigation Floodwaters: Legal Considerations for Enacting, Implementing & Funding Stormwater Programs, which outlines current legal issues associated with user-fee funded, municipal, separate-storm-sewer-systems stormwater programs, and a summary of selected legal decisions and pending cases. The goal of the publication is to provide greater analysis on the types of legal issues impacting stormwater funding programs – and provide an overview of trends that are emerging based on the outcomes of key cases – to inform and prepare utilities that are creating, implementing or defending a stormwater program, utility or fee.
In 2016, EPA Region 1 issued NPDES permits for small MS4s in Massachusetts with an effective date of July 2017. A nearly identical permit was issued by EPA Region 1 for small MS4s in New Hampshire with an effective date of July 2018. Massachusetts and New Hampshire are two of only four states that do not have the authority to implement NPDES permits and other CWA programs. Several interested parties appealed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
The permits required MS4s to comply with water quality standards, in addition to the requirement to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable (MEP) as required by the Clean Water Act (CWA) and impose strict compliance schedules for doing so. The permits also attempted to regulate flow, in the form of specific retention requirements, which a federal court has previously held is not within EPA’s authority.
Given that the outcome of this case would likely set an important legal precedent on how stormwater permits are written, NACWA supported its impacted members in challenging the most concerning elements of the permits.
In April 2020, after years of negotiation and mediation efforts and thanks in part to NACWA’s involvement, EPA published proposed modified permits for both Massachusetts and New Hampshire. NACWA supports EPA’s proposed modifications as the revisions omit the unlawful “cause and contribute to a water quality exceedance” and now include an offramp that allows municipalities a more flexible path forward for demonstrating when pollutant reduction is no longer practicable.
NACWA views the permit modifications as a positive step forward from the original permits that significantly departed from the statutory boundaries of the Clean Water Act and may have set a negative precedent for stormwater agencies to adhere to overly strict and prescriptive numeric water quality standards and total maximum daily load requirements.
NACWA is committed to engaging in legal actions over municipal stormwater permits where appropriate to ensure the permits conform with federal law and provide MS4s with the needed flexibility to make the best investments for water quality improvement.